Forum

Cosma (non-complete...
 

Cosma (non-complete) Cat Food Question  

  RSS

(@faktars143)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 12
08/02/2018 1:30 pm  

Good afternoon all!

I've been doing some digging through the forum for an answer to a question I have, and I can't seem to find anyone who has had this particular question answered already! (Sorry if they have and I've missed it...).

The boys have been a bit hit and miss with food, and after a lot of research I decided that the Whiskas they were being fed at the sanctuary wasn't really all that good. I've tried a few foods with them, my priority being something with a high meat content (not derivatives). I've found COSMA food on ZooPlus, and they absolutely love it. I have read however that the Tuna is the only complete food in that range. So, my question is, if I feed the cats the COSMA foods, but also give them Applaws Dry Cat Food (chicken, complete) would that make their diets complete? The dry food is listed as a complete food, so my plan would be to feed them a small 85g tin each in the AM, dry food at lunch, small tin each for dinner and then dry food to follow.

Look forward to your replies!

Thanks all,


Quote
(@bennothing)
Active Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 6
09/05/2019 7:23 pm  

Hope someone could help with this. Was wondering about the same thing as well.


Admin liked
ReplyQuote
(@buzzsharer-comgmail-com)
Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 68
09/05/2019 7:59 pm  

No, they'll be having a nutritionally deficient diet. Don't feed your cats complimentary food on a regular basis, don't feed them tuna on a regular basis, and try not to feed dry food as a large part of their diet. Feed them a a diet of nutritionally balanced wet food, ideally with a high meat content that doesn't contain grain, carbs, sugars . These  are not suitable for cats 

Canagan has similar texture to Cosma, while being complete? Cats can be picky about what form/ texture the food has as well as the other more ingredient-related differences.


ReplyQuote
Share: